Are mutual funds more tax-efficient than ETFs? (2024)

Are mutual funds more tax-efficient than ETFs?

ETFs are generally considered more tax-efficient than mutual funds, owing to the fact that they typically have fewer capital gains distributions. However, they still have tax implications you must consider, both when creating your portfolio as well as when timing the sale of an ETF you hold.

ETFs and index mutual funds tend to be generally more tax efficient than actively managed funds. And, in general, ETFs tend to be more tax efficient than index mutual funds.

Gains from equity mutual funds held for more than 12 months attract long-term capital gains tax at 10 per cent if the total long term capital gains amount from equity oriented mutual funds/ equity shares exceed ₹1,00,000 in a year. Returns below that threshold are tax-free.

Unlike ETFs, mutual funds can be purchased in fractional shares or fixed dollar amounts. ETFs typically have lower expense ratios than mutual funds because they offer minimal shareholder services. Though mutual funds may be slightly more costly, fund managers provide support services.

Because ETFs trade on an exchange, they transfer from one investor to another. As a result, the ETF creator does not need to redeem shares each time an investor wishes to sell or issue new shares when an investor wants to make a purchase. For mutual funds, the share redemption can trigger a tax liability.

Index funds—whether mutual funds or ETFs (exchange-traded funds)—are naturally tax-efficient for a couple of reasons: Because index funds simply replicate the holdings of an index, they don't trade in and out of securities as often as an active fund would.

In a nutshell, ETFs have fewer "taxable events" than mutual funds—which can make them more tax efficient. Find out why. ETFs can be more tax efficient compared to traditional mutual funds.

ETFs trade on the major stock exchanges at any time during the day. Prices fluctuate throughout the day like stocks. ETFs generally have lower operating expenses, no investment minimums, are tax efficient, have no sales loads, and have brokerage commissions.

When looking at the 10 largest mutual funds by asset size, the turnover ratio is almost 75% (1). This means investors will pay higher taxes in the form of distributions due to mutual fund managers selling or buying 75% of the stocks that make up their fund annually.

What are the tax disadvantages of mutual funds?

You must pay taxes on dividends, interest, and capital gains that the fund company distributes to you, in addition to capital gains on sale or exchange of shares in your account. Reinvesting distributions in more shares of the fund does not relieve you from having to pay taxes on those distributions.

With some exceptions for certain types of ETFs, long-term capital gains are taxed at no more than 15% (zero for investors in the 10% or 15% tax bracket; 20% for investors in the 39.6% tax bracket ).

Why? For starters, because they're index funds, most ETFs have very little turnover, and thus amass far fewer capital gains than an actively managed mutual fund would. But they're also more tax efficient than index mutual funds, thanks to the magic of how new ETF shares are created and redeemed.

In terms of safety, neither the mutual fund nor the ETF is safer than the other due to its structure. Safety is determined by what the fund itself owns. Stocks are usually riskier than bonds, and corporate bonds come with somewhat more risk than U.S. government bonds.

For most ETFs, selling after less than a year is taxed as a short-term capital gain. ETFs held for longer than a year are taxed as long-term gains. If you sell an ETF, and buy the same (or a substantially similar) ETF after less than 30 days, you may be subject to the wash sale rule.

Examples of tax-advantaged investments are municipal bonds, partnerships, UITs, and annuities. Tax-advantaged plans include IRAs and qualified retirement plans such as 401(k)s.

There are many ways an ETF can stray from its intended index. That tracking error can be a cost to investors. Indexes do not hold cash but ETFs do, so a certain amount of tracking error in an ETF is expected. Fund managers generally hold some cash in a fund to pay administrative expenses and management fees.

Mutual funds are usually actively managed, although passively-managed index funds have become more popular. ETFs are usually passively managed and track a market index or sector sub-index. ETFs can be bought and sold just like stocks, while mutual funds can only be purchased at the end of each trading day.

Is Spy ETF tax-efficient?

In general, ETFs possess significant tax advantages, but that's not so for these funds. Exchange-traded funds are growing in popularity for a number of reasons, but one of the biggest is their tax efficiency. SPDRs (SPY), the oldest such fund, has not paid a capital gains distribution in the past 10 years.

ETFs can be a great investment for long-term investors and those with shorter-term time horizons. They can be especially valuable to beginning investors. That's because they won't require the time, effort, and experience needed to research individual stocks.

The single biggest risk in ETFs is market risk. Like a mutual fund or a closed-end fund, ETFs are only an investment vehicle—a wrapper for their underlying investment. So if you buy an S&P 500 ETF and the S&P 500 goes down 50%, nothing about how cheap, tax efficient, or transparent an ETF is will help you.

ETFs may close due to lack of investor interest or poor returns. For investors, the easiest way to exit an ETF investment is to sell it on the open market. Liquidation of ETFs is strictly regulated; when an ETF closes, any remaining shareholders will receive a payout based on what they had invested in the ETF.

However, it's rare for broad-market ETFs to go to zero unless the entire market or sector it tracks collapses entirely. The sharpest decline the last few decades has been in 2007, when some total stock market ETFs like IWDA lost 37% in one year.